Shroud of turin 3d statue12/19/2023 ![]() ![]() It cannot yet be refuted.īut Colin Berry didn’t do what others had done. I ask again that you provide published evidence to refute this claim.Īs long as we continue to think of just regular paintings or photographs of people or normal objects – and we ignore the cries from the fallacy police – we are on pretty safe ground. “OK Hugh ,” wrote Todd, “Maybe you can respond to this quote. It has been repeated and restated over and over by others. There was, among those who understood that a normal painting or photograph of a person or object contained brightness information that was representative of reflected light while the image on the shroud contained brightness information that was not that but rather seemingly spatial data, a sense that the argument was safe. Everything else was distorted no real 3D. Then they tried to do the same thing with photographs of people and objects. Air Force Academy) used a VP-8 analog computer furnished by Pete Schumacher, an engineer with Interpretation Systems, Inc., to make a brightness map of the Shroud image. Jackson, with the help of Eric Jumper (both on active duty and teaching at the U.S. This obvious absence of evidence as evidence fallacy – call it what you want: argumentum ad ignorantiam, the black swan problem – has stood, it seems, since sometime after 1976, when (quoting from A Critical Summary of Observations, Data and Hypotheses – Version 2.1 by Bob Siefker, et. ![]() Therefore, the Shroud image, itself, is unlike any other object or image known to exist. It is the “data” existing on the Shroud of Turin, which induces the unique photographic results. The Shroud of Turin induces a result through photographic imaging that is unique, compared to all other photographic results taken from other objects of the same acknowledged period as the Shroud, of prior periods, and to the present day. It’s from a 1999 paper by Pete entitled Photogrammetric Responses From The Shroud of Turin. Todd, a reader of this blog, just yesterday posted the following quotation from Peter Schumacher. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |